Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 881 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12500 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than EPYC 7302P - 130 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $195.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-12500 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |