Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 587 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 7% better in Halo Infinite than EPYC 7302P - 169 vs 158 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58094 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1122
51.68125287885766%
Multi-Core
8172
89.10696761530913%
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |