Buy on Amazon
$179.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 587 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Rust than EPYC 7302P - 231 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 125 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-11600K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
