Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4790 is 1924 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4790 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790
- Performs up to 22% better in Diablo IV than EPYC 7302P - 172 vs 141 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 84 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-4790 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 84 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |