Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 106 days newer than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-9100F - 357 vs 347 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
347
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |