Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 881 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 26% better in Minecraft than EPYC 7302P - 799 vs 636 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 65 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
799
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$161.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $161.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3087 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |