Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 587 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in Resident Evil 4 than EPYC 7302P - 198 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 125 vs 155 Watts
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$232
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $232 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3368 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |