Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2728 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Celeron G550 - 198 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 80% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $19.59 vs $98.79
- Up to 80% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Athlon 3000G - $0.1 vs $0.5 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
189
95.45454545454545%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
40.229885057471265%
Multi-Core
629
31.848101265822788%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |