Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2728 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G550 - 166 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G550 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 4 vs 2 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |