Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1051 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3930T - 123 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 455 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
Picasso | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |