Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1701 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 50 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 13% better in God of War than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile - 51 vs 45 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
