Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R7 250X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2261 days newer than Radeon R7 250X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 44% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250X - 52 vs 36 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250X - 50 vs 80 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250X - 4 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Radeon R7 250X
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $99 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 950 MHz |
| 1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
