Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R7 250X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 560 days newer than Radeon R7 250X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250X
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 80 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 58% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R7 250X - 57 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 250X - 4 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R7 250X | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Feb 13th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$99 | MSRP | $649 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
72 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
950 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1125 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |