Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2242 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 19% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Radeon R9 280 - 69 vs 58 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 50 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
90%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
62%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
