Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 285 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2060 days newer than Radeon R9 285.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon R9 285 - 65 vs 58 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 50 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 4 vs 2 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
92%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
