Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1680 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 50 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 57 vs 49 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
30%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
