Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R9 380X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 1596 days newer than Radeon R9 380X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Radeon R9 380X - 238 vs 236 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 380X - 50 vs 190 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 380X
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
61%
Radeon R9 380X
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
31.04 GPixel/s
80%
Texel Fillrate
124.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $229 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 182.4 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 970 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1425 MHz |
