Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2191 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 4 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 87% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 86 vs 46 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 19 vs 50 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |
