Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 2165 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 50 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 5% better in Grand Theft Auto V than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 90 vs 86 FPS
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
58%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
42%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
