Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 1882 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 150 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 39% better in Borderlands 3 than GeForce GTS 250 - 68 vs 49 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 4 vs 1 GB
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $199 | MSRP | $1499 |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
