Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 390X outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 390X is 2297 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390X - 150 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Performs up to 14% better in Far Cry 5 than GeForce GTS 250 - 113 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 8 vs 1 GB
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Radeon R9 390X
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 390X
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
67.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
184.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $429 |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1050 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
