Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTS 250 outperforms Radeon R7 260 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTS 250 is 1749 days older than Radeon R7 260.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 95 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Radeon R7 260
Desktop • Dec 17th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 17th, 2013 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $199 | MSRP | $109 |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
