Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTS 250 outperforms Radeon R7 250E on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTS 250 is 1752 days older than Radeon R7 250E.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Radeon R7 250E - 87 vs 84 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 55 vs 150 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTS 250
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
10.8 GPixel/s
84%
Texel Fillrate
43.2 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
12.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
25.6 GTexel/s
59%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| $199 | MSRP | $109 |
| 2x DVI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
| 64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| 675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
