Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce GTS 250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 2008 days newer than GeForce GTS 250.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 150 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 7% better in Far Cry 5 than GeForce GTS 250 - 106 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 - 2 vs 1 GB
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Mar 4th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $249 |
2x DVI | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
64.51 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
675 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1008 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |