Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 2039 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 58 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 110% better in Sons Of The Forest than GeForce GT 220 - 44 vs 21 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
