Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1680 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 58 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 19% better in Forza Horizon 4 than GeForce GT 220 - 164 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 2 vs 1 GB
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
