Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1498 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 58 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 48% better in Sons Of The Forest than GeForce GT 220 - 31 vs 21 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 3 vs 1 GB
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
