Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 1554 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 58 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 51% better in Resident Evil 4 than GeForce GT 220 - 68 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
