Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms UHD Graphics P630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1721 days older than UHD Graphics P630.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 32% better in New World than UHD Graphics P630 - 79 vs 60 FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
UHD Graphics P630
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics P630
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
3.6 GPixel/s
5%
Texel Fillrate
28.8 GTexel/s
11%
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-WM | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
