Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms UHD Graphics P630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 2281 days older than UHD Graphics P630.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than UHD Graphics P630 - 169 vs 165 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
UHD Graphics P630
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics P630
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
3.6 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
28.8 GTexel/s
48%
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-WM | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
