Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms UHD Graphics P630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 2080 days older than UHD Graphics P630.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 7% better in FIFA 23 than UHD Graphics P630 - 146 vs 136 FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
3.6 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
28.8 GTexel/s
28%
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
HD Graphics-WM | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |