Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms UHD Graphics P630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 2262 days older than UHD Graphics P630.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 15 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 22% better in Death Stranding than UHD Graphics P630 - 73 vs 60 FPS
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
UHD Graphics P630
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics P630
Integrated • May 13th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
3.6 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
28.8 GTexel/s
27%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
May 13th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-WM | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
