Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1833 days older than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU.
Advantages of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 15 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 57% better in Stray than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU - 69 vs 44 FPS
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
26.4 GPixel/s
41%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
20%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | HBM |
| System-Shared | Bus | 4096-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
