Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 2521 days older than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU.
Advantages of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 15 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU - 45 vs 38 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
26.4 GPixel/s
82%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
41%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
