Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 2192 days older than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU.
Advantages of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 24% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU - 31 vs 25 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
26.4 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
51%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
