Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 2374 days older than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU.
Advantages of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 15 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 0% better in League of Legends than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU - 367 vs 366 FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Integrated • Sep 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
26.4 GPixel/s
88%
Texel Fillrate
52.8 GTexel/s
50%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1100 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
