Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 310 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 145 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 44 vs 16 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 247 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |