Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1463 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than FX-8350 - 223 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 44 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 125 vs 145 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5400 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 8 |
44 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |