Buy on Amazon
€285
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2746 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 154% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-8350 - 61 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than FX-8350 - €268.88 vs €285.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than FX-8350 - €4.41 vs €11.88 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FD8350FRHKHBX – FX-8350 CPU con Wraith Cooler AM3 + 125 W 4.0 GHz 16 MB Cache 32 nm Black Edition
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10864 minutes ago
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
61
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€268.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Processore Intel® Core™ i7-10700KF per sistemi desktop 8 core fino a 5,1 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 125 W
Buy for €268.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10865 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8350
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
