Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 1540 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 5900 - 44 vs 24 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 8% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 220 vs 203 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 65 vs 145 Watts
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€392.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €392.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 244 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 12 |
44 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |