Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2696 v3 outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2696 v3 is 685 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than FX-8300 - 254 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 36 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €80.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
18 | Cores | 8 |
36 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |