Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1526 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 259 vs 239 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 24 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €379.64 vs €428.99
- Up to 4% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-12900K - €1.59 vs €1.66 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
95%
Price, €
€428.99
88%
FPS Winner
Buy for €428.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5872 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
239
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5873 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |