Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 664 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 40% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3900 - 220 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - €60.9 vs €129.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-7820X - €0.39 vs €0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15096 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
157
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |