Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 1101 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 39% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - €60.9 vs €100.0
- Up to 36% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Athlon 200GE - €0.61 vs €0.95 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 5% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 105 vs 100 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18399 minutes ago
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |