Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7740X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7740X is 664 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i7-7740X - €60.9 vs €156.88
- Up to 57% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-7740X - €0.32 vs €0.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7740X - 51 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7740X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7740X
- Performs up to 11% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G3900 - 212 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18649 minutes ago
Core i7-7740X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.74/FPS
43%
Price, €
€156.88
38%
FPS Winner
Intel - Processore core i7-7740x (kaby lake-x) quad-core 4.3 ghz socket lga 2066 boxato moltiplicatore sbloccato (dissipatore escluso)
Buy for €156.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18649 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i7-7740X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 112 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
