Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - €60.9 vs €164.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-10600K - €0.61 vs €1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G3900 - 117 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
100
85%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16441 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
43%
Price, €
€164.99
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €164.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16441 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |