Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €60.9 vs €117.91
- Up to 38% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i3-10105 - €0.1 vs €0.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 17% better in Minecraft than Celeron G3900 - 717 vs 614 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16984 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
717
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
62%
Price, €
€117.91
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16984 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |