Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100T is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-7100T - €60.9 vs €110.03
- Up to 44% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-7100T - €0.34 vs €0.61 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G3900 - 179 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
178
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17749 minutes ago
Buy for €110.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17750 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |