Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 821 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - €60.9 vs €106.1
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 51 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 2% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G3900 - 255 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Buy for €106.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
46.29482071713147%
Multi-Core
992
27.99097065462754%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |