Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2046 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €109.7 vs €158.88
- Up to 28% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i5-9400F - €0.64 vs €0.89 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than Core i5-4670K - 178 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 6 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
171
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€109.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €109.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |