Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 798 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - €158.88 vs €188.75
- Up to 5% better value when playing Valorant than Core i5-11600KF - €0.21 vs €0.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Valorant than Core i5-9400F - 873 vs 773 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
773
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12658 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
873
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
95%
Price, €
€188.75
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12657 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |